?

Log in

No account? Create an account
irc bbc un tacocat - here is where i live

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile
> <3

me!
contact info
writing/art journal
flickr
youtube
last.fm
social networking and potential boning
okcupid
myspace
facebook

July 16th, 2006


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
08:43 pm - irc bbc un tacocat
i think the main reason i post in here so much less than a few years ago is that now i bring all my random thoughts to irc instead.

this prompted by my asking the following in irc:
[8:38:55pm] <skrolnik> does anyone know how the UN works?
[8:38:57pm] <skrolnik> "It was passed unanimously by the Security Council after being revised to drop any mention of Chapter Seven of the UN Charter, which is legally binding and can authorise sanctions or even military action.... The UK and US ambassadors to the UN described the resolution as strong and binding."
[8:39:13pm] <skrolnik> tha'ts from a bbc article and i am having trouble reconciling the two statements

seriously i don't get it. what's binding about a resolution that was specifically edited to remove the binding parts? i don't know if they're bragging, stupid, or just didn't read the resolution.

edited to say that i just got a myspace friend request from "Israel Will Destroy The Arab-Islamic Enemy" hahahahahha the earth is doomed
np: interpol - nyc

(en garde!)


> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com