October 11th, 2006
|07:43 am - oh look, a press release. are YOU the press?|
Polling officials allowed 17-year-old to vote
Teenager now facing felony charges
Eden Prairie, Minn. – September 28, 2006: Calling it the biggest thing he has ever done in his entire life, Jesse L. Hunter voted in the Minnesota primaries on Sept. 12. However, Hunter is unlike other voters casting their ballots this year. He is only 17 years old.
"They [polling officials] examined my driver's license and asked for my social security number," Hunter said, "but they never seemed to notice that I wrote '1989' as the year of my birth. I voted, and walked out euphoric, bearing an 'I Voted' sticker upon my forehead."
Hunter tells fellow members at the National Youth Rights Association (NYRA) that he never intended to actually vote, but wanted to spark a conversation on the voting age. He considers the current voting age to be unfair to those under the age of 18. "I learned about the importance of voting from my high school government teacher," he said.
Hunter's mother broke down in tears after receiving a phone call from the district attorney's office informing her that her son will be charged with voting fraud, a class one felony in the state of Minnesota. According to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission, a judge is allowed to give a sentence of up to 12 months in jail or other non-jail sanctions as conditions of probation for someone with no criminal history.
"Many adults take the right to vote for granted: more than 80 million eligible adults failed to vote in the 'high turnout' 2004 election," said Alex Koroknay-Palicz, NYRA's Executive Director. "Yet for exercising the central civil right in this country, Jesse is being charged with a felony."
"If Jesse was a year older, he would be applauded for doing his civic duty, but instead, he is being charged with a crime," said Adam King, NYRA's Vice President. "Jesse had the courage to stand up for what is right - for democracy - and he could go to jail for doing so."
Founded in 1998, NYRA is the largest youth rights organization in the country. Based in the Washington, D.C. area, the organization is committed to fighting for increased rights of young people. NYRA has nearly 7,000 members nationwide.
for those who don't know, i have been into youth rights for a good while now. i got burnt out pretty quick on trying to actually, ya know, do anything, but it's still something i'm interested in. and this seems like it could spin into an actual issue, right here. compare, for example, to susan b anthony doing the exact same thing in 1872. and now she's on a silver dollar! and chicks got the vote, and stuff. so clearly, the times they are potentially a-changin'. also of note is that lowering the minimum age of various things is being discussed more and more often around the world, and sometimes even acted upon. the czech ages of criminal responsibility and of consent were both just recently lowered to 14. (as a side note, while lowering the criminal age was roundly approved, the age of consent is causing all manner of ruckus. how in the flying crap ass hell did being able to have sex become more controversial than being able to be jailed for life?)
 wait now i'm not sure if it was or not. is there an upper house that also needs to approve? is that what the chamber of deputies is? this article isn't entirely clear and i'm afraid i'm not up on the czech political system.
np: dominion: prequel to the exorcist
|Date:||October 11th, 2006 03:12 pm (UTC)|| |
very interesting. thank you for sharing this.
no really. that was wicked interesting.
|Date:||October 11th, 2006 03:13 pm (UTC)|| |
hi im becka and i forget to sign into livejournal.
Wicked ballsy! Go him! It's about time young people got their butts to the polls.
Personally, I think it's BS that a person old enough to have the responsibility of driving itsn't old enough to vote for an elected official. But that's just me.
go him, indeed! this kid is my new hero.
this is all something that'd been discussed for years - have someone go in, try to vote, and push it into a court case - but nobody ever actually went through with it before
I think if they can try you as an adult, you should be able to vote for the state and local officials - including judges and DAs (DAs are elected, aren't they? Now I feel dumb) who can potentially put them away as adults. I think that's simple enough - if you want to punish people at a c It's just as cut and dry to me as allowing men who are old enough to die for their country to vote.
It helps if I finish my thoughts: "If you want to punish people at a certain standard, that standard should be upheld across the board to reflect what rights they have as well"
not poor kid, he knows what he's doing. it's a rosa parks sort of move, make them enforce something obviously unjust to drum up support against it. like the article said, he didn't expect any of this to happen at first, but now he's planning to see it through