December 9th, 2001
i like the faith no more cover of this song more (even tho it's almost notefornote the same..)
speaking of songs, i think i've linked this before, but download the bjork song by the brunching shuttlecocks, as it is the cutest song ever and amuses me greatly. word!
[dammit, why did i just post this in fucklist by mistake? hee, at least i noticed..]
np: lionel richie - easy like sunday morning
i have told you on numerous occasions that you are forbidden from death!
yeah, well, find a cure for fatal migraine disease
so i'm still working on it. i can't get past the pickle matrix
well hurry up! and get a cure for the flu too.
i'd be happier with a cure for colds. i've had one off and on for months now
|Date:||December 9th, 2001 09:47 pm (UTC)|| |
i like the faith no more cover of this song more
I agree completely.
as well you should. i am right, after all
|Date:||December 10th, 2001 03:23 pm (UTC)|| |
Actually, I was right, then you formed the same opinion.
ha! you disagreed, therefore you are wrong
|Date:||December 10th, 2001 04:27 pm (UTC)|| |
Not true, I merely pointed out your flaw. While I agree with your assessment, I don't agree because you are correct, I agree simply because I had formed that opinion first and you came to the same conclusion.
yes, but i asserted that i was right, then you disagreed and said you were and i was comign to the same conclusion. according to the buddy bears rule
, which is given in song and therefore correct, you are wrong because you disagreed.
|Date:||December 10th, 2001 11:02 pm (UTC)|| |
I never disagreed. I always agreed we were in agreement, but your reasoning was flawed. Pointing out flawed logic is not disagreement.
but my logic was entirely devoted to our being in agreement due to it beign the right opinion. if you agree with that, then the logic isn't in dispute, and you - as you seemed - are disputing my initial statement of my rightness, based on order. which means you are disagreeing with me
|Date:||December 12th, 2001 11:00 am (UTC)|| |
Incorrect. While your logic may have been devoted to our being in agreement, it used the wrong method to achieve the correct end result.
yes, but you dont' seem to be disputing the logic itself, but one of the statements it is being based on. therefore you are disagreeing with that statement [of my rightness]