?

Log in

No account? Create an account
here is where i live

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile
> <3

me!
contact info
writing/art journal
flickr
youtube
last.fm
social networking and potential boning
okcupid
myspace
facebook

March 29th, 2002


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
03:52 pm
stolen from mad who stole it from dilbert:
Now let's talk about the unfortunate employees of Enron. If those employees are like most employees, they've been making personal phone calls on company time, stealing office supplies, fudging expense reports, lying about their accomplishments and using sick days for vacations. Compare that to the executives who allegedly stole hundreds of millions of dollars. The philosophical question to consider is this: Are the executives LESS honest or just MORE effective?

I tried out that philosophical question with some of my friends the other day and they informed me that stealing from a company is okay if you think the company deserves it and you take less than $1,000 per year. Now when my friends leave my house, I do a full inventory.
and in other news:
King Nixon (3:51:45 PM): *eats your brains*
stgegodess (3:51:56 PM): HA! Jokes on you! I DONT HAVE ANY
np: Opal - Mazzy Star (with Hope Sandoval) Heroin (Velvet Underground cover) (Live Berlin 1988)

(6 shots upside the head | en garde!)

Comments:


[User Picture]
From:kingnixon
Date:March 29th, 2002 03:31 pm (UTC)

Re: simpy more effective of course

(Link)
then why are they the ones being dragged through the coals for screwing over their pilfering employees?
[User Picture]
From:plural
Date:March 29th, 2002 03:58 pm (UTC)
(Link)
because
they got
caught

[User Picture]
From:kingnixon
Date:March 31st, 2002 09:29 pm (UTC)
(Link)
if the crime is impressive enough, people still like them after they're caught. i was just reading a thing today in maxim about "ballsy heists." half of them, the people got caught eventually, but their capers were cool enough to allow that

> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com